Home Disney Merchandise Lawsuit Filed Against Fuel Rod for “Unlimited Free Swap” Claims

Lawsuit Filed Against Fuel Rod for “Unlimited Free Swap” Claims

Fuel Rod Wars - The Adventure Continues

Earlier this month we reported that Fuel Rod locations at Disneyland and Walt Disney World would abandon the “free swap” model for the Fuel Rod phone battery charger service. In order to get a fresh battery at Disney locations after November 1, 2019, guests will have to pay $3. A California based law firm has filed a suit citing false advertising, among other claims.

According to Attractions Today, the law office of Carey, Danis & Lowe is seeking damages from Fuel Rod’s parent company Tropican, Inc. In addition to the false advertising claim, the lawsuit states that Tropican and related parties are in breach of contract and the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act and that their advertising was false or misleading.


[the_ad id=’41485′]

The plaintiff in this case, Tyler Veasy of Sarasota, Florida, alleges that Fuel Rod sold an inferior product that he (and others joining the suit) would not have purchased under the new terms. The filing cites that the battery delivers less than a full charge to an average smartphone and that in terms of speed of charge, the battery offered by Fuel Rod is on the lower end of the spectrum.

The details of the filing echo what many of our readers had to say about the change: that we would not have purchased it if it wasn’t for the free unlimited swapping. Many noted that the battery is inferior to other, much cheaper, available options. What Fuel Rod had going for it was the convenience of swapping out the battery for a fully charged one. With the $3 charge per swap, readers expressed that they would be looking to purchase a superior battery and just remember to charge it each evening themselves.

The good news is that readers who bought the Fuel Rod under the free swapping terms need not join the lawsuit in order to benefit from it. According to James Rosemergy, Esq. of the aforementioned law firm, in the event that Fuel Rod is found liable, “Anyone impacted will have the opportunity to participate whether they have formally joined the suit or not.”

I definitely felt like changing the terms significantly devalued the product. But also, I felt like I’ve probably wasted $30 many times over and wouldn’t find it worth a lawsuit. What do you think?

-Rebecca W Davis


  1. I agree that the fuel rods aren’t the best. They charge the phone very slowly and usually never to 100%. Plus they get super hot.

    • I don’t even think I got a receipt when I purchased mine in February. I don’t think there was anything in the “fine print” about a limited time unlimited free swap. Some other outlets had photos of the kiosks and there’s no asterisk or anything like that.

  2. Great news! What has Disney to say about this lawsuit? They should have put pressure on the recharge company to do the right thing in the first place by respecting their contract with Disney guests… But I guess that’s expecting to much from a company that already gouges every penny it can out of its guests…

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.